Skip to content

Accelerate Mpls

The mpls car guy living & writing about it

Archive

Tag: Saab

After my first run in with the SRX I had strong opinions, both good and bad.  The new SRX is a valid contender in this automotive segment and pushes the envelope for Cadillac both in quality and as a class competitive product.  My largest gripe was that the base powertrain is weak and affected the driving experience.  A simple question: would the optional turbo V6 engine fix the driving experience?

The main highlight of the SRX Turbo is larger engine which is funny because the engine in not actually larger because it is a 2.8 liter while the base V6 is a 3.0 liter.  The extra power in the this V6 really comes from the turbo, putting out 300 hp and 295 ft-lb to all four wheels all with max torque coming at 2000 rpm.  The all wheel drive system is the torque vectoring unit from Haldex.  This is the same unit that made its debut in the now dead Saab TurboX a few years back and can transfer up to 90% of the torque to the rear wheels at any given time.  The torque can also be distributed between the wheels side to side.  All of this gets put to the ground through a six speed automatic transmission with manual shift capabilities.  So the question still remains:  does this extra power fix the SRX driving experience?

The answer is yes and no.  Yes, the driving experience is much better.  In fact, leaps and bounds better.  In normal and spirited driving the car does not feel strained like the base 3.0 liter V6.  Even pulling away from a stoplight, you notice the difference.  In normal driving the engine does not feel like it is working hard.  The revs are easily kept under 3ooo rpm’s unless pushed.  When pushed, the engine responds quickly with no noticeable lag.  The turbo is going almost constantly whenever you have your foot on the gas.  Something to note is that you cannot put the needle into the red on the turbo gauge.  Why would you have the red there when you cannot put the needle in that zone?  The first thing people said to me was to put it in the red and I had to respond sadly, “It does not go that high.”

The downside to this engine is the gas mileage.  Rated at 15/22, this engine could definitely be described as thirsty.  I cannot decide what is worse about the mileage;  the fact that it is just terrible for this vehicle class, or that it is coming from the engine putting out the power that this vehicle really needs.  That mileage is no joke either.  I averaged 15.3 mpg during the week and it is worth noting that the gas it is guzzling requires premium.  I did not really stretch the SRX Turbo’s legs so I cannot comment on the highway mileage though I can assume that it matched the EPA rating pretty close to dead on.  Again, that city mileage is really not good and is so bad that it starts to dip into body-on-frame SUV mileage.  For example, the much larger body-on-frame Chevrolet Tahoe is rated at 15 mpg in the city with a V8.  If SRX Turbo engine had direct injection it would post better fuel mileage numbers and would be more competitive.

As mentioned in my previous review of the SRX, the interior styling is very well done. The materials all look and feel great. It uses the center stack from the CTS (minus the tiny climate control screens on each side) and the door handles are uniquely shaped.  These little details help set it apart. That said, the back seat is somewhat short on leg room with a taller driver.  The cargo area has a terrific cargo management system with sliding tie down brackets and there is a decent sized storage cubby below the rear floor that can hold items away from public view.

The styling is terrific.  I am still undecided about the front air dam being so low and whether it makes it look better or worse.  The rear taillights hark back to the “tailfins” on older Cadillac’s and play nicely with the overall design.  The rear diffuser finishes off the rear while integrating the exhaust into the overall design.  The A-pillars in this vehicle are ridiculously huge and they make sight lines a problem in a few instances and the rear window is tiny and makes visibility awkward so the back up camera is definitely useful in a parking lot.  The twenty inch wheels fill out the wheel wells nicely and look great because they are painted aluminum wheels instead of chrome plated.  Another thing that still bugs me is the GM chiclet.  I mentioned this in my original review, and again, I assume the tooling was already set before the decision to ditch this “Mark of Excellence” was made.

The SRX Turbo I had was a premium model with almost all of the bells and whistles.  The rear seat entertainment system package with dual rear screens and wireless headsets with remote adds $1,295 to this package and  I like the way this system is set up with screens in the back of the seats and separate video inputs for each.  The second option was the crystal red tintcoat which will set you back $995.  All said, including destination fees, the total sticker price of this particular SRX Turbo came to $54,475.

I want to take a second to talk about the competition.  The SRX is really going head to head with the Lexus RX. It was developed and bench marked against that vehicle and the marketing pitches it that way.  As I mentioned earlier, the price on this SRX Turbo was close to $55,000 and that is a lot of coin while there are a lot of other great vehicles for that price.  The SRX Turbo starts under $50,000, for that price you can get a nicely equipped Acura MDX or an Ecoboost Lincoln MKT and, while the Ecoboost MKT is a much larger vehicle, it just goes to show the breadth of this segment and price range.

There must be something about the SRX because each time I have had the vehicle we have gotten whacked with lots of snow here in Minneapolis.  The SRX Turbo handled it like a champ plowing through the white stuff with the all wheel drive sending power to the wheels with traction.  It felt weird but sometimes I thought the electronic stability control was slow to kick in.  The front wheel drive SRX handled the snow with its low profile, all season tires better than expected, so this all wheel drive version had absolutely no issues.

As with the other SRX I reviewed, I do like this vehicle.  When you compare it with the direct competitor, the Lexus RX, you see the SRX is a more engaging and dynamic vehicle.  The optional turbo powertrain definitely fixes the anemic feeling but at the large expense of gas mileage and in reality, the bulk of the SRX’s sold will be equipped with the base 3.0 liter V6 and that engine will be fine for those who are more concerned with the gas mileage.  For those who really want to take the SRX to its full potential, you will have to take the hit on the gas mileage and option for the turbo V6.


Full Disclosure- The review vehicle was provided by General Motors

Episode 14 starts by discussing the past week on both of our respective blogs, AutoBird Blog and AccelerateMpls. The week in review included January’s numbers and Betting on the Little Guy.  We move along to the major news of the week segment.  This week included-

  • Latest Toyota recall recap
  • GM deciding to keep the Renaissance Center
  • Current Saab 9-5 ends production
  • All new Saab 9-5 hitting showrooms in Q2

We then proceed to the clip of the week segment.  This week we featured the preview from the documentary on closure of Ohio GM plant which earned an Oscar nomination.

Last but certainly not least, we discuss our main topics.  This week those topics included a goodbye to Saturn and Pontiac along with Colin making the argument that Kia might be in a crisis.


Download this episode (right click and save)

Episode 13 starts by discussing the past week on both of our respective blogs, AutoBird Blog and AccelerateMpls. The week in review included Dodge’s three new Charger ads and GM to manufacture it’s own electric motors.  We move along to the major news of the week segment.  This week included-

  • Toyota recalls an additional 1.1 million vehicles
  • GM has appointed Ed Whitacre as permanent CEO (for now)
  • Opel confirms another 8,300 jobs to be cut
  • The upcoming new Ford Explorer
  • Ford earned $2.7 billion in 2009

We then proceed to the clip of the week segment.  This week we featured the later then it should have been Chrysler holiday ad.

Last but certaintly not least, we discuss our three main topics.  This week those included Chrysler’s future, the sale of Saab to Spyker and Toyota’s latest recall woes.


Download this episode (right click and save)

Episode 10 starts by discussing the past week on both of our respective blogs, AutoBird Blog and AccelerateMpls. The week in review included 2009 sales numbers, and my post about why strippers are important.  We move along to talk about NAIAS (the Detroit Auto Show) and the things we will be seeing.  That list includes the next generation Ford Focus, the Chevrolet Aveo RS concept, Ford’s MyFord, and the Buick Regal GS concept.  Next we discuss the new Dodge naming scheme and announced Chrysler powertrain updates.  The last topic continues to be the Saab story that continues to unfold.


Download this episode (right click and save)

Episode 9 starts by discussing the past week on both of our respective blogs, AutoBird Blog and AccelerateMpls. The first topic was the Cadillac SRX that I drove this past week. The rest of our conversation focused on the year in review. Everything from the sad stuff to the funny stuff, nothing was left out. Things mentioned included the best/worst automotive brand of the year, best/worst nameplate of the year, the Ram brand, losing Saturn, Saab, Pontiac, Hummer, and much much more. We look forward to episode 10 in 2010!


Episode 8 starts by discussing the past week on both of our respective blogs, AutoBird Blog and AccelerateMpls.  The week in review included GMAC, my Lexus ES350 review, the dead 2011 NSX and the Cadillac SRX I just took delivery of for the week.  The next topic is the Saab story that continues to unfold.  Our conversation moved on to the upcoming Detroit Auto Show (NAIAS) and what we have heard will be there.  The last topic we cover is the 2010 North American car and truck of the year.


500x_3_01
Saab 900

When the deal between GM and Koenigsegg for the sale of Saab fell through Saab was in trouble.  Many people, including myself, were very excited back in June when word came out that Koenigsegg was purchasing Saab.  Koenigsegg is a Swedish super car maker which many felt would compliment Saab very well.  The possibilities were there, Saab was going to be a Swedish company again.  Many of us on Twitter were even talking about the possibility of the Aero X concept coming to fruition someday with Koenigsegg’s technology and super car knowledge.  In November the deal feel through because Koenigsegg backed out.

When the deal fell through with Koenigsegg GM said they would take a few days to reconsider the situation.  GM reevaluated and announced they would take until the end of December to find a new suitor.  If one could not be found, Saab would be shut down.  BAIC bought the tooling and rights to the old/current Saab platforms.  This does not include any new or future product just the current and past line up.  They plan on using the design and platforms for their vehicles.  Word then came out that the only real suitor interested in Saab and the future of the brand was Spyker.  While slightly different then Koenigsegg, there are many similarities.  Both companies are small.  Many assumed that for whatever reason Koenigsegg backed out of the deal, Spyker would follow suit.  As many predicted, the negotiations broke down and it was realized that the deal would not happen no matter how much time was spent.  GM announced Friday morning that they would wind down Saab operations and the brand would be killed off.

A little background on how all this came to be. GM purchased fifty one percent of Saab back in 1990 and in 2000 GM purchased the remaining portion.  Saabs tag line has been “Born From Jets”.  Saab started life by producing fighter jets.  After World War II they started producing cars.

Many say the brand was diluted with non-Saab product.  To an extent they were correct.  The 9-7x was quite possibly the worst Saab ever.  With that said it was one heck of a nice Trailblazer (for what it was).  The 9-2x (commonly referred to as the Saabaru), while more fun the 9-7x, was still no where near a Saab.  It was merely a re-badged Subaru WRX wagon.  With all wheel drive and the fun of a WRX in a slightly more upscale package (emphasis on slightly) the 9-2x was the one really nice WRX, but not really a Saab.

Saab has become an after thought for many consumers.  The sales numbers reflect this.  In October only 513 vehicles sold in the United states.  It got even worse in November when only a mere 371 vehicles sold in the United States.  The vehicles are not class competitive and overall are an after thought for most people.  Even many Saab enthusiasts were not buying.

The all new 9-5 was so close to production.  On paper the car was promising.  In my opinion, the new 9-5 just might have been the ultimate vehicle on the Epsilon II platform.  I personally was excited to test the top tier model with a Turbo V6, XWD (a torque vectoring all wheel drive), adaptive suspension, and many more features.  Not to mention a slick six speed manual transmission along side the automatic transmission.  Many cars in this class do not even offer a manual transmission as an option.  This was going to be a drivers car.  The 9-4x was also close to production ready.  This vehicle was going to be a midsize crossover based on and developed alongside the new Cadillac SRX.

Funny thing about the death of Saab.  When the announcement came Friday morning it instantly hit Twitter.  People were tweeting about this news around the world.  In fact, Saab was trending as a topic for over half the day.  Thousands upon thousands of people were whining and complaining.  People were telling stories about their Saab experiences.  So where were all these people when purchasing a car?

Things were finally looking up for Saab.  They had fresh product in the pipeline that was actually class competitive. Technology was going to be a key component in their vehicles, and over all the persona of the brand seemed to be going less GM and more towards its Swedish roots.  I was excited at the prospect of Saab finally getting back to being Swedish and possibly a little quirky.  Nearly 20 years after GM bought Saab they are going to be killing it. Saab was born from jets as they say, but they were killed by GM.

That was all I was planning on writing but Saturday morning a new development seemed to occur in this story.  Rumors swirled that the Swedish government was holding emergency meetings this weekend to try and save Saab.  Something to keep in mind is that Sweden has small population.  The government is probably nervous about impact the closure of Saab will have on the small nations economy.  This sounds awfully similar to what happened to GM and our government this past summer.

Sunday morning the story developed a new chapter.  It was said there were eleven sticking points between GM and Spyker that prevented the sale of Saab.  We do not know what these eleven things where as they were not made public.  It has been said that Nick Reilly who is GM’s man in Europe called off the Sale between Spyker early Friday morning due to concerns about intellectual property.  One of Spykers backers was going to be Russian and this was a concern.  Rumors are now swirling that Spyker resubmitted a new offer on Sunday fixing some of those concerns and set a deadline for GM of Monday December 21 at 5pm EST. (UPDATE 12/21/09 4pm- Spyker just announced they have extended the deadline for GM.  No new time was given.)

It is evident that Spyker really wants Saab.  Spyker themselves note many benefits to both Saab and themselves. Below is an excerpt from Spyker.

“In Spyker’s view, the ownership of Saab by Spyker Cars would add a lot of value to both parties. For Spyker, Saab would bring a strong, global distribution network consisting of no less than 1100 dealers, state-of-the-art production facilities, a truly dedicated work force and solid engineering, sourcing and research & development capabilities. Likewise, Saab would receive the financial backing required to compete as a competitive global brand, along with an entrepreneurial leadership team sensitive to the uniqueness, heritage and individuality of the Saab brand. Throughout these negotiations, both Spyker and Saab leadership have proven that they share a mutual vision for just such a partnership.”

GM continued to say upon questioning this weekend that Saab will be wound down over the course of three months beginning in January.  I for one hope that Saab has a second chance at survival.  I am however a realist and understand these are all rumors. We will see how this all plays out. For now the official word is still Saab dead.

2010 Saab 9-5
What was the upcoming all new 2010 Saab 9-5

Below is Spykers press statement from this weekend about the new offer made to GM.

PRESS RELEASE

SPYKER CARS RENEWS OFFER FOR SAAB THAT REMOVES LAST HURDLES

ZEEWOLDE, The Netherlands (20 December, 2009) -Following the announcement on Friday that the intended sales terms of Saab Automobile AB between Spyker and General Motors (GM) could not be finalized, the Spyker leadership has submitted a renewed offer in the hopes of securing a future for Saab, its employees and the brand, despite the announcement that the winding down of Saab would begin.

Spyker CEO Victor R. Muller said today that an 11-point proposal had been submitted to GM, addressing each of the issues that arose during the due diligence process and that the renewed offer would remove each of the obstacles that were standing in the way of a swift transaction.

“We have made every effort to resolve the issues that were preventing the conclusion of this matter and we have asked GM and all other involved parties to seriously consider this offer,” said Muller.

“We are very confident that our renewed offer will remove the impasse that was standing in the way of an agreement on Friday, and this would still allow us to conclude the deal prior to the expiry of the deadline originally set by GM of December 31st,” said Muller.

“Despite our collective eleventh hour set-back, we are returning to the table with a renewed offer, that addresses every known issue brought to light during the initial negotiations and that has the full backing of the Saab Management. The new offer eliminates the need for an EIB loan approval prior to year end, for example, which will allow the deal to be concluded within GM’s deadline. Our efforts are based on our passion for saving an iconic brand that we would be honoured to shepherd, and the jobs and livelihoods of thousands of loyal Saab employees, suppliers and dealers around the world. Some 1,500,000 Saabs are on the road today and their proud owners would no doubt welcome the survival of this phenomenal brand,” he added.

In Spyker’s view, the ownership of Saab by Spyker Cars would add a lot of value to both parties. For Spyker, Saab would bring a strong, global distribution network consisting of no less than 1100 dealers, state-of-the-art production facilities, a truly dedicated work force and solid engineering, sourcing and research & development capabilities. Likewise, Saab would receive the financial backing required to compete as a competitive global brand, along with an entrepreneurial leadership team sensitive to the uniqueness, heritage and individuality of the Saab brand. Throughout these negotiations, both Spyker and Saab leadership have proven that they share a mutual vision for just such a partnership.

“Our company motto is nulla tenaci invia est via – for the tenacious no road is impassable,” said Muller, “And we intend to remain true to that throughout these negotiations as we bid to secure Saab’s future and revive the company.”

The renewed Spyker offer is valid until 5pm (Eastern Standard Time) on Monday December 21, 2009.

Podcast

This week, episode 5 discusses the week in review on both of our respective blogs, AutoBird Blog and AccelerateMpls.  We first discuss the upcoming LA Auto Show beginning with the 2011 Ford Mustang V6.  Our conversation moved on to the all new 2011 Chevrolet Cruze and the new 2011 Audi A8. The last topic we cover is the broken Koenigsegg/Saab deal that fell through last week.