Not content to let Ford and Chevrolet take the Police departments over fully Dodge has revealed the upcoming Police Pursuit vehicle. This is the 2011 Dodge Charger in all it’s glory. In fact this is the first official picture released by Chrysler of the 2011 Dodge Charger. Details are still flowing in but you can bet the pursuit vehicle will feature both the new Pentastar V6 (that just launched recently in the new 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee) and the Hemi V8 with MDS. Rear wheel drive will of course be the drive train set up and it is still murky as to the transmission choice, though I would assume the current 5 speed automatic will be in the police Pursuit vehicles. Oh by the way, they finally got around to adding a column mounted shifter for the police package thus freeing up some space between the seats for other equipment. Also inside the Pursuit vehicle they are touting red and white LED interior lighting which is for night-vision equipment and more.
Anyone that has been on the internet lately has probably heard of the Fiesta Movement. The car’s unique marketing has definitely stirred interest into a vehicle that has not been in the American market for quite a while. This small vehicle is a hit in Europe and many Americans have been requesting the vehicle. With the car finally here, the question is how much was lost in translation? Is the American Fiesta as good as the European version?
Exterior
The exterior has not changed much from the European model. Gone are the normal fog lights and projector headlights. Instead, you have LED light pipes where the fog lights would normally go. The sedan version of the Fiesta also wears a chrome three bar grille instead of painted insert. The hatch back does not have the chrome three bar grille rather it sports a painted insert that is closer to the European models look. I think they are the same size and you could swap the painted insert in place of the chrome three bar setup if you wanted to. Personally, I like the look of the painted insert better. From the front fender to the rear quarter panel, a strong character line runs down the side of the car. While the headlights are up swept and unique, the tail lights wrap around the sides and are a basic non-offensive oval shape. The overall sedan is better looking then I thought it would be. Much better then the comparable Toyota Yaris.
Interior
The interior of the Fiesta is really close to the European counterpart. The gauges look very European while the radio controls are supposed to remind you of a cell phone. While I am not sure of that, there are definitely a lot of buttons in a tiny space. I found it easy to operate and the interface was clean. The small 4-inch display glowed red and was easy to read in all lighting conditions. The Microsoft SYNC system operated as advertised, and was really quite handy. One thing that is different from the European model is the climate control. No automatic climate control is offered, though it was extremely warm while the Fiesta was here and it always kept the interior nice and chilly. The seats were comfortable, with adequate side bolstering. I did find the seat bottoms a bit flat when driving on a road trip. The graining on all plastics was very nice and the seat fabric felt like great quality material. With a soft touch pad for the top half of the dash, if it doesn’t feel quality it certainly looks the part. Rear seat legroom is somewhat short, but if you are under six feet tall you will be OK. I am not sure an adult would enjoy a road trip back there, but it is doable. The steering wheel was the perfect size and the electric power steering had great feedback and on-center feel. At night the Fiesta I was in had “mood lighting” with seven different color options. My girlfriend settled on a color resembling teal for the week. If you find it distracting the lighting, can be turned off. Overall the interior is a huge win. Everything from ergonomics to style, the Fiesta fits the bill and then some.
Powertrain
The Fiesta comes standard with a 1.6 liter four cylinder engine pushing out 120 horsepower and 112 pound feet to the front wheels. That power goes through the standard five-speed manual or optional six-speed dual clutch dubbed PowerShift. Off the line ,the Fiesta is no rocket. In fact, it almost seems a little sluggish. Once you get revs a little higher the car starts to feel faster then it really is. Driving the car I always seemed to have a stupid grin on my face, even though I was not going that fast. The Fiesta I had was equipped with the five-speed manual. Personally, I liked the gearbox. It was fun with clean shifts. Though on the highway I will admit at times I longed for a sixth gear. Not because of engine drone or anything like that (engine and wind noise was in check), but because the car probably would have gotten better mileage. The five speed manual is rated at 29/38 while the six speed dual clutch is rated at 30/40 (with SFE package, 20/38 without SFE package). I averaged 29.9 mpg in the city during the week, which was good considering I was definitely not trying to get the best mileage. On the highway I managed to average only 34.5 mpg. It is worth noting I had the cruise control set at 77 mph on the highway trip. I can only assume going slower and or having another gear would have significantly increased that average.
So how much of the car was lost in translation? Frankly, not a ton. In fact some of the technical changes when coming across the pond made the car better. For instance, the addition of knee airbags gave the people up front more leg room. The car is a blast to drive and many people commented on how fun the car was. Everyone seemed to the like it. An Audi A6 owner commented on how great the car looked, both outside and inside. This car is a huge value and a win for America. If you look at the direct competition such as the Toyota Yaris, the Fiesta almost puts it to shame. The Fiesta SE I had was somewhat optioned with the Rapid Spec 203A package (nowhere near loaded) and had a sticker price of $15,990. That is without a question a value. I definitely would take the Fiesta over the Toyota Yaris. The Honda Fit has many tricks of its own, so it really depends on what your uses will be. With the Mazda2 coming, the Fiesta has a ton of competition in this segment. In the end, it has the goods to fight off the competition.
Photography- Alex Bellus
Full Disclosure- The review vehicle was provided by Ford
Yup, that’s right, you are viewing the completely undisguised 2011 Hyundai Genesis. Most changes are slight but still notable. The front end has a new front bumper (see the lower air intakes) with updated headlights (reportedly LED’s), new front/rear/side skirts and rear bumper with Lexus LS460 looking exhaust outlets integrated nicely. That new rumored eight speed transmission is obviously on board with the new BMW looking “shift knob.” That eight speed transmission is probably hooked to the rumored 5.0 liter Tau V8 which is an update to the current 4.6 liter Tau V8. Most likely the output will break the 400 hp barrier. This engine will also probably be in the upcoming Equus. Check out more spy shots at The Car Blogger.
I have read all the brochures and online materials, I have seen all the pictures – and the reality is none of that does the Fisker Karma justice. I could sit here and list all of its specifications, but I won’t. Mainly because that is not what this post is about. Many of you have not had the opportunity (yet) to see the Fisker Karma in person. When you do, you will remember it. The lines and curves on this car are just gorgeous.
Lets back up a minute. What the heck is a Fisker and what is the Karma? Funny you should ask. Fisker Automotive is a new car brand founded by Henrik Fisker, who is also the current CEO (funny how that works). He was previously known for being the design director for Aston Martin and the president and CEO of BMW’s Designworks USA. Maybe that does not mean much to you, but it equates to this: he is responsible for cars such as the BMW Z8 (one hot piece of metal), Aston Martin DB9 and the V8 Vantage (also both hot pieces of metal). Needless to say, he has a sense of style when it comes to designing a car.
The Karma is the first car from Fisker Automotive. With demo cars arriving at the end of the year, production should (if it stays on track) start in the very beginning of next year. The car will be built overseas in Finland initially. In fact, it will be built in the same factory as some Porsche’s and other vehicles. In 2012 production will move to the Wilmington Assembly plant in Wilmington, Delaware. This plant was recently purchased by Fisker from General Motors. With the plant already up to date with tooling and a local trainable workforce, it is an ideal location. The plant was previously producing the Saturn Sky, Pontiac Solstice and Opel GT.
One last thing before we get to the actual Karma – If you have not seen pictures I will tell you that this the car is a saloon. It will fit two sets of golf clubs in the trunk, but getting in and out of the rear seat isn’t exactly graceful. Another car is coming in 2012 from Fisker, and it will be a more mainstream, higher volume vehicle. Currently the project is code named Nina and it will be a midsize sedan. I was informed it will be about the size of the BMW 5 Series, but with much more usable interior space (read really practical). The Nina should come in somewhere around $45-48k. Also coming sometime between the 2012 Nina and 2011 Karma is the Karma Sunset. The Karma Sunset is essentially a convertible version of the Karma, featuring a retractable hard top.
Upon seeing the Karma in person, I really was stunned. Yes, from the front it looks somewhat like the Joker from Batman. It still looks great though. Some of the design cues from the front translate to the rear and interior. This gives the car an overall cohesive design. Each rear fender has a “fuel” door. On the passenger side is the gasoline, while on the driver side is the plug-in for the rechargeable lithium ion battery pack. The front headlights feature LED running lights, while the rear tail lights are also LED. The roof features a full length solar panel to help charge the car and provide cooling for the interior cabin while the car is parked. I remember the early 2000′s Audi A8s had this as an option on their sunroof. The wheels are 22 inches (!) and are made from a lightweight alloy. The brakes are the same Brembo setup used in the Cadillac CTS-V. The door handles have a electronic push pad under each handle that you merely push and the door opens. This is similar in concept to the Chevrolet Corvette and new Cadillac CTS Coupe. As you can see in pictures, the exterior is just gorgeous. Some might say breathtaking. I do suppose some could say it is controversial but I am in the “it is definitely gorgeous camp.”
Ok, I can understand how someone might be mixed on the exterior of this car, but the interior is simply stunning. This is a whole new take on luxury. This interior feels so different from all the other luxury sedans out there. When I think of high end luxury cars (we are not talking small volume cars like the Rolls Royce Phantom), I think of cars like the Audi A8, Lexus LS 460 and many others. This car is completely different inside. To be honest, when I got inside of the Karma I felt like I had just stepped inside one of the older Chris Craft boats. With rich thick leather and real wood, the interior just felt so natural and polished, yet elegant. Keep in mind this was a pre pre-production car. The 10.2″ center touch screen, which controls most of the cars functions (A/C, Radio, etc) was stuck in a black loading screen (I’m guessing the software was not ready) and the car could not turn on, though the gauges were lit up and the windshield wipers worked (I checked). Oh something to note, the engine in the Karma is being sourced from GM – though that is not the only thing. I noticed both the turn signal/cruise control stalk and the windshield wiper control stalk were both parts bin GM. In fact, I am 99% sure they are the very same stalks in the Cadillac STS. Whether these are the exact stalks found in the production sedan is yet to be seen. Also, the rear view mirror is GM sourced too. The gear shift level (if you could call it that) has a button on the left that I assume starts the car due to it’s power symbol and the lack of any other power button on the console or near the steering wheel. The right hand part of the gear shift level is actually a switch that gets flipped into different positions to select your gear (PRND). Down the center of the interior is the battery pack, but it is packaged beautifully behind glass and leather. The front seats are downright sporty, comfy and are terrific. The rear is awkward to get in and out of, but once in the car, the seats are comfortable. Leg room is acceptable but not amazing. The roof line does cut into rear headroom. Overall, the interior is stunning.
The power will come from a battery pack with a 50 mile range. Beyond that 50 mile range, the 2.0 liter turbo range extender engine kicks in and produces 260 horsepower. This motor is sourced from GM and is the same engine used in the Saturn Sky Redline and the Pontiac Solstice GXP. The total range between the battery and the gasoline engine is 300 miles. You can forget range anxiety – this is a series hybrid just like the upcoming Chevrolet Volt. That means the gas engine is in no way driving the wheels. Rather, the engine is connected to the battery which powers the two electric motors connected to the rear wheels. We will get into all the technical stuff in another post some other time.
The cars sticker price before tax rebates is $89,000 and change. I know there is a government tax rebate and certain states (I think Minnesota does) also has tax rebates on qualifying vehicles. The dealership here, which is the one and only one for the state of Minnesota has pre-sold and took deposits for 3 Karmas. I was told varying numbers for how many total cars the dealership has pre-sold, but the most common number I heard was 17. Not bad at all.
So what are my final initial impressions? Well, I can not wait to get my hands on a production model. Considering I did not get to drive or start this one, and the infotainment system did not work, I cannot give a full impression post. I can say it does not feel “kit car” in anyway. The interior is just ridiculous (in an amazingly good way). The exterior I love, but some will not. This is for sure a legitimate automobile with a company that I frankly hope succeeds in many ways. As for the Karma, I’ll see you soon!
What you are looking at might quite possibly be a slightly refreshed 2011 Lexus IS sedan. Tweeks apparent in from pictures include-
LED daytime running lights at the bottom of the headlights
Adaptive cruise control option
Update steering wheel
New wheel pattern
New fog light design
New tail lights
The IS was last retouched in 2009 which would mean that a these minor tweeks would carry the current generation over until 2012 when a full refresh will probably take place.
For more pictures and information check out the Lexus Enthusiast.
Lets be frank, the last two generations of the Chevrolet Malibu were underwhelming to say the least. That is actually probably being nice. Were they transportation? Sure, that does not mean that they would have been on my list of recommended cars. That is all changed with this latest generation Malibu. Chevrolet has taken this seriously and really wanted to show something with this car. They wanted to show they could really build a good car. This was one of the cars that started this new wave of good product. So how good is it really? Is this top of its class or back at the end of the line again? Lets find out.
Exterior-
The exterior of this car is terrific. I like the lines, the design, the greenhouse, the front, the rear, ok you are getting the picture. I personally really like it. I have heard some say the rear looks truncated and too short. I like it. The rear C-pillar is great. The A-pillars are not ridiculously oversized like some of the newer General Motors cars. The rear taillights on the LTZ model I had featured LED lighting and I personally think they are much better looking then the plain unit found on the lower trim models. The headlights have a great design to them and the dual port Chevrolet grille works well on the front end. The panel gaps are all ridiculously tight! I do wish the four-cylinder model would get dual exhaust like the V6, especially in LTZ trim. Overall the exterior is a win.
Interior-
Like the exterior the interior is sharp looking. The particular Malibu I had was a loaded up LTZ model which featured a two-tone brown and cream color scheme. The leather seats looked great and were supportive. The fit and finish was terrific just like the exterior. The top of the dash has soft touch material (lesser trim models do not feature soft touch material). The wood is definitely fake. The upgraded Bose branded sound system sounded fine but not mind blowing. A USB port was on the head unit and connected to my iPhone quickly without an issue. The front seat backs are scooped out to increase rear seat leg/knee room. The automatic climate control is simple to use and the radio is the General Motors black tie unit. Overall the interior looked nice but I know the materials fall slightly in the lower trim models.
Powertrain/Driving Dynamics-
The Malibu I was in was equipped with a 2.4 liter inline four pumping out 169 hp and 160 ft-lb to the front wheels. This power is channeled through a six speed automatic transmission with no manual transmission as an option. I wanted to note the base trim Malibu (LS) is equipped with a four speed automatic transmission while all over trim levels have the six speed. The loaded Malibu LTZ I was in had paddle shifters. I have to ask the question (you know you are thinking it) of why? I have no real answer. The four-cylinder model has electric power steering instead of a hydraulic set up. I will say it never feels ridiculously over boosted at parking lot speeds and has decent on center feel on the highway. Mileage is rated at 22/33 MPG, which are decent ratings though no longer class leading. I came close on the city rating averaging 21.2 mpg but on the highway I could only eek out an average of 27.2 mpg. It is worth noting that my highway average was cruising at 75 mph, which leads me to believe that if I was cruising at 65 mph I would have come closer to the rated 33 mpg average.
Ok now for some gripes. First and foremost this car has a bad combination. I know you are thinking what could it be. It is simple; this is one of the heaviest and one of the least powerful cars out of its direct competitor set. This is not a great combination to have. This is most reflected in passing power on the highway. Also you cannot—in any trim level or options package—get dual climate control. The closest you will come to navigation is your iPhone or OnStar. While such things did not matter as much a few years ago when this generation Malibu made its debut, it matters now.
Final Thoughts-
The original question was, is this car best in class or back at the end of the line again? After a week with the car I can whole-heartedly say it is a good car. With that said, it has flaws and that holds it back from being best in class. That is not to say it is back at the end of the line again. This is a good car. Quite possibly the Malibu is the tightest screwed together car Chevrolet produces. The panel gaps are insane, and the interior is good. The car is showing its age as the competition has upped the ante in the powertrain, technology and feature department. This Malibu is a good car, but the competition has stepped up their game and that is what keeps this car from being great.
Side Note-
I have seen the next generation Malibu that will be a 2012 model year vehicle. It should go on sale hopefully in the summer of 2011. It looks terrific. I do not know what powertrain will be used, but I can naturally assume some of my complaints with the current car will be remedied while keeping the quality I saw in this one.
Full Disclosure- The review vehicle was provided by General Motors
Another month of spring has come upon us and that means another Cars & Café gathering on a Saturday morning. The coffee was flowing and everyone seemed very happy to see Kylee from Imola Motorsports pull in with the doughnut holes in the backseat of Kevin’s M5. This month, rain was not in the forecast and the cars started flowing in early and fast. By 8:30 the lot was full and people were already parking cars up on the hill.
My Father & My 300ZX
Some of the notable cars from last month made repeat appearances including the VW Bus and the Scion XB with the LED lights. In fact, the XB parked next to our 300ZX. On Friday night I saw a Subaru WRX that looked like it was on its way to a rally but, in fact, it was being pulled out of where it is kept for Cars and Café. The WRX was literally kitted out and looked rally ready. Two really nice last generation Toyota Supra’s were in attendance along with two Ford GT’s that seem to be regulars at the event. Two Audi R8 V10′s pulled in along with two 4.2 V8 models. Of course the myriad of Porsches, Audi’s and Mercedes were lined up. Two BMW 8 Series made it out along with an M Coupe. A custom 1978 Porsche 924 was revealed at the show and I must say it looked terrific.
Audi R8 V10
Custom 1978 Porsche 924
The AutoMotorPlex has been hard at work on newest build out of new buildings. They are in the process of building out new garages currently. As you can see in the picture, it looks like the heated floors are being laid out now (that is just a guess).
This month the organizers had something special in store. Many left the AutoMotorPlex for the first annual drag day immediately after the event. The group traveled to Eau Claire, WI to Rock Falls Raceway. Sadly, I could not attend due to a prior commitment though I heard it was a blast.
With more cars than last month and terrific weather, we are already off to a great start to the season. Next month promises to be even better as the weather warms up more.
The first generation SRX was really never the sales success that Cadillac hoped for. Styling on the the first generation made it look like a tall, boxy station wagon. With both an optional third row and V8, the first generation was rear wheel drive with all wheel drive as an option. None of this really lined up with what the mainstream rivals were offering.
For the second generation, Cadillac has taken a much more mainstream approach. The third row option was ditched, front wheel drive and all wheel drive replaced the old drive train and there is no more V8. The largest change is the price. This generation is starting at $33,330 where the first generation was $38,880 for the V6 and $45,880 for the V8. The new SRX is much more competitively priced. You can immediately tell that Cadillac is gunning straight for the RX in every sense of the word. A base SRX is now almost $4,000 less then the starting price of a Lexus RX. So how does it stack up?
The interior is closely related to the CTS, which is not a bad thing. The center stack with the rising screen is directly lifted from the CTS. The software used in the touchscreen is definitely upgraded. I could pair my phone using only the screen in the SRX while I had to dig out the manual to figure out phone pairing with the voice command system in the CTS. The gauge cluster has a trick screen in the center of the speedometer. This screen essentially had all the trip computer functions while also displaying the speed limit on most major roads. Navigation directions are also shown with this display. The interior has non-overpowering white LED “mood” lighting at night. The seats are supportive but not firm. They are much softer than the seats in the CTS Sportwagon which, in my opinion, were better. The cargo area has a track running around it that sliders can be placed in to secure cargo. This is a very nice feature that is executed quite well.
The styling of the SRX is strong both inside and out. From the outside, the evolution of Cadillac’s arts and science styling is in full swing. The sharp creases and strong character lines all play together to create a rather good looking CUV. The rear end has the classic Cadillac “tail fin” tail lights. The angular styling leaves a D pillar in the back that creates a large blind spot. The rear window is very small, causing visibility to be less than stellar when backing up. The back-up camera is a much needed feature. The front air dam is low and I actually asked people at GM about this. They said it was both for aerodynamics and it looks better in their opinion. I do not know about all that, but in deep snow it acts as a plow. The little touches on the outside caught my eye. For example, the headlight has the Cadillac symbol stamped in the reflector. One thing that did not add up was the GM chiclet. This “Mark of Excellence” has now been removed from new models, but I assume the tooling for the SRX was already in place before the decision was made to ditch this “Old GM” symbol.
The engine in the vehicle I had was the base 3.0 liter direct injection V6 putting out 265 hp and 223 ft-lb to the front wheels. All wheel drive is optional with this engine. The optional 2.8 liter turbo V6 puts out 300 hp and 295 ft-lb to standard all wheel drive with torque vectoring. Both engines feed out to six speed automatic transmissions with manual shift capabilities. The base 3.0 liter is some what of a dog. The lack of torque is the main problem here. The SRX is not light weight, as such you can feel every one of those 265 hp and 223 ft-lb trying to get underway. The vehicle is more engaging than the class champion, Lexus RX, but feeling the engine trying to cope with the vehicle’s weight is not the best experience even though it does get up to speed just fine. More power would be welcome via the optional 2.8 liter turbo. The problem with this option is the mileage, which is rated at 15/21 mpg while the front wheel drive 3.0 liter is rated at 18/25 mpg. People seem to take these numbers very seriously these days and that turbo looks thirsty on paper for this vehicle segment.
The particular SRX I had was a premium collection vehicle with a sticker price of $47,010. This is the top level non-turbo model. There were not many options, but rear seat entertainment was on board for $1,295 and of course GM’s crystal red tintcoat for $995. Each rear seat has a flip up monitor attached to the back of the front seats with two wireless headphones and a wireless remote control that comes standard with the system. I liked the set up, and in my opinion, was done correctly. The upgraded stereo that was in this package was a 10 speaker 5.1 digital surround sound by Bose. I was not really that impressed with the system. It sounded decent enough but the optional Mark Levinson system in the Lexus RX is better. I would have liked to have seen something like the optional Harmon Kardon system from the LaCrosse in the SRX.
Equipped with 20 inch wheels, low profile tires and front wheel drive, I will admit I was a little nervous when the blizzard came through town. In fact, I drove through three blizzards and over 1000 miles within three days while driving the SRX. The only problem that I saw was with the front air dam. It is so low that it plowed through the snow and getting started down an unplowed street was not easy. It is worth mentioning that I was able to make it up a driveway that was covered in 2.5 feet of snow. To do this I had to turn off traction control and slam the gas in order for it to crawl its way up. Overall, I was impressed with everything it did in the snow. I somehow managed to eek out 26.5 mpg on the highway back through one of those storms. That is 1.5 mpg more then the EPA’s 25 mpg highway rating.
So we have gone from a rear wheel drive with an optional third row and V8 to a front wheel drive and optional turbo V6. How did we fare? The SRX is now officially a competitive vehicle. The last generation was not a mainstream approach and sales reflected that. Yes, I do think the base engine is under powered. In reality, the general public might not even notice. They will notice the mileage numbers that the turbo gets and will not be that impressed with them. I am guessing most SRX’s will leave the lot with the base 3.0 engine and customers will be content. The vehicle has distinctive styling and I like the overall packaging. While some powertrain improvements are needed, this new SRX is a solid contender in this hotly contested segment.
Full Disclosure- The review vehicle was provided by General Motors
Yup, that’s right, you are viewing the completely undisguised 2011 Hyundai Genesis. Most changes are slight but still notable. The front end has a new front bumper (see the lower air intakes) with updated headlights (reportedly LED’s), new front/rear/side skirts and rear bumper with Lexus LS460 looking exhaust outlets integrated nicely. That new rumored eight speed transmission is obviously on board with the new BMW looking “shift knob.” That eight speed transmission is probably hooked to the rumored 5.0 liter Tau V8 which is an update to the current 4.6 liter Tau V8. Most likely the output will break the 400 hp barrier. This engine will also probably be in the upcoming Equus. Check out more spy shots at 
