Hey, remember the Lincoln Mark LT? It was a really nice Ford F-150 with a Lincoln badge and different grille. It didn’t sell well. Seems as if people didn’t want a Lincoln pickup truck.
So, how do you sell a high-dollar pickup truck with all the luxury amenities you can stuff into it? Ditch the Lincoln badge and label it the Platinum F-150. So the question is, is the F-150 Platinum the platinum standard? Let’s find out. Read More…
The question many people ask me is if there is a replacement for displacement. I have had this discussion at length multiple times recently. With all the new CAFE requirements and the public’s demand for better fuel economy, some people are worried about fun cars.
While it is true things need to change to achieve better gas mileage numbers, that does not mean the fun will end. New technologies are making different things possible for this new age. The use of direct injection and forced induction will likely play a large role in the future of the combustion engine Many automakers are already downsizing their engines and starting to implement these technologies.
Ford is utilizing twin-turbo charging in combination with direct injection to create more power from smaller displacement engines. They are calling this technology EcoBoost. Using two turbos spooling up at different times, it reduces the old problem of turbo lag. Achieving maximum torque under 2000 rpm’s is one benefit from using this set up. Even better is that the torque curve is flat! Ford is getting 365 horsepower and 355 pound feet of torque out of a EcoBoost V-6 displacing only 3.5 liters! The engine could undoubtedly handle more boost and produce much higher numbers than that, but long term durability would be called into question at some point. Some theorize that the 3.5 liter EcoBoost could have an output of 450+ hp and 450+ ft-lb.
2010 Audi S4 Supercharged 3.0 liter V6
I mentioned earlier that many companies are downsizing the displacement of their engines. Ford’s EcoBoost powerplant is just the beginning. In the 2010 Audi S4, a supercharged V6 is used. This replaces the 4.2 liter V8 found in the previous generation S4. Many worried about the hp and torque ratings of the car when the smaller displacement engine was announced. The fact is, the 2010 S4 with its supercharged V6 has more torque and only slightly less hp than the V-8. The gas mileage has improved greatly and the driving dynamics are still intact. The only real loss was the deep burble from the throaty V-8. Problem was, that V-8 was thirsty.
Mercedes has also announced they will start downsizing their engines and will begin to offer more forced induction on future models. Mercedes’ performance arm AMG will be following suit with downsizing and forced induction as well. BMW has already started this with the latest M models, which utilize twin-turbo V8′s instead of naturally aspirated V10′s.
2009 Chevrolet Corvette LS3 6.2L V8
All this talk about forced induction is great. Downsizing is definitely going to play a role in the future. However, that is not to say you can’t get decent gas mileage out of a big, naturally-aspirated engine. A base model Chevrolet Corvette is rated at 26 mpg on the highway. That is 26 mpg from a 6.2 liter V-8, producing 430 hp! That isn’t terrible – in fact that is down right great! No direct injection, no turbos, no superchargers – just good old American muscle. The 2010 Ford Mustang 5.0 V8 achieves 25 mpg on the highway. Again, naturally aspirated, with no forced induction.
Back to the original question, is there a replacement for displacement? It really can be answered either way. Yes, you can get the power of a naturally aspirated V-10 out of a blown V-8, or V8 power from a technology-infused blown V-6. And now, we are just starting to see V-6 power from inline 4′s with direction injection and turbos. What you do lose when you try replacing displacement is the sound and feel of the engine. A turbo V-6 just doesn’t have the same rumble when you start it up. Everyone’s opinion will differ on this topic. In the end, mine is that you can replace the power of a larger displacement motor and even get some better characteristics, but in the end you can not replace the feel and experience of a larger, naturally-aspirated engine. It will always be different, but not necessarily worse.
The Focus has been a staple in the Ford line up since 1998. Originally available as both a sedan and a hatch, the car was versatile and overall a great value. Things have changed in recent years and the Focus is currently only available in sedan form. Further along those lines of change, the car is no longer the game changer it once was. Ford is looking to change all that with this next generation Focus.
2012 Ford Focus Sedan
The new Focus will be the car that truly launches and embodies the “ONE Ford” strategy. That is one car sold globally. Focus will share over 80% of its parts with the European version. Even further, the European model and U.S. model will launch at the same time. Production will start simultaneously in Europe and North America in late 2010 with sales beginning in early 2011. The platform will be used for 10 global C-class cars. This will amount to almost two million units in annual production by 2012.
2012 Focus 5 Door Hatchback
Arriving both in sedan and hatchback form the Focus will target exceptional fuel economy while advancing the level of technology and quality in a C-segment vehicle. The Focus will feature kinetic design language recently seen on the new Fiesta. “The all-new Focus is at the center of convergence for automotive trends,” said J Mays, Ford group vice president of Design and chief creative officer. “We’ve designed it with an acute understanding of global customers, yet it’s tailored for each individual region. Focus combines the best from Europe, North America and Asia to deliver a level of emotional driving enjoyment never before experienced in a car this size.”
2012 Ford Focus 5 Door Hatchback
Ford is promising new levels of agility and responsiveness being brought to the C-segment with the new Focus. Utilizing multilink rear suspension and semi-isolated front and rear subframes, Ford is saying this will help achieve the desired driving characteristics. Complimenting all this is a all new electric power steering system. This system has been tuned for responsiveness at highway speeds while still remaining light for parking lot speeds.
2012 Ford Focus Sedan
The global powertrain line up in the new Focus will have everything from an EcoBoost four cylinder to a Duratorq TDCi common rail diesel. The North American Focus will launch with a all new DOHC 2.0 liter gasoline engine featuring both DI (Direct Injection) and Ti-VCT (Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing). This 2.0 liter is estimated to put out 155 hp and 145 ft-lb through a six speed PowerShift transmission. PowerShift is Ford’s new dual clutch transmission that is also being used in the new 2011 Fiesta. The new 2.0 liter will be E85 capable unlike most engines with DI.
PowerShift 6 speed transmission
2012 Focus Interior
The PowerShift dual dry clutch transmission is sealed. The transmission is said to be maintenance free. The removal of pumps and hoses not only saves weight but helps achieve better fuel economy. Additionally, the new Focus will feature a Hill Start Assist function. This system is sensor based and will activate when an incline is greater then 3 percent. The system will “hold” the brakes for an “instant” (2.5 seconds) which will prevent rollback when stopping or starting on an incline.
The innovative MyFord system announced last week at CES will be available on the new Focus. This will compliment the latest generation Microsoft SYNC system which includes a sophisticated voice control system, bluetooth, and satellite navigation.
2012 Focus Interior
“When the new Focus launches in late 2010, it will be among the global leaders in fuel economy and CO2 emissions,” said Kuzak. “We will continue to pioneer new technologies beyond launch, including a true zero-emission model launching in North America in 2011. Throughout its life cycle, Focus in all forms, in all regions, will demonstrate the Ford commitment to deliver unsurpassed fuel economy on a truly global scale.”
High strength steel is used heavily in the next generation Focus especially in the body shell. The high strength steel comprises 55 percent of the body shell. More then 26 percent of the vehicles overall structure is ultra high strength steel and Boron Steel. This is more then any other Ford product to date. This helps with safety and weight. Due to the extensive use of these materials, the next generation Focus has 25 percent greater torsion rigidity.
“We believe the new Ford Focus will provide consumers with an unmatched driving experience, together with an unrivaled ownership experience,” said Jim Farley, Ford group vice president, Global Marketing. “The Focus brand always has been very special to Ford, and this new global model shows our commitment to developing another generation of exciting and appealing cars.”
The Focus promising to be a lot of things. On paper it sounds great. It even has room for growth with future engines like a sport EcoBoost model in North America perhaps, or possibly a SVT version. The fact remains, we as Americans have been asking for the Focus that Europe has had for years. It seems we will be receiving a car that is in large part just that. The new Focus should have Honda and Toyota up at night.
I have heard the “New GM” say over and over again that any product launch can not be just a launch, it has to be a success. The new LaCrosse for Buick is no exception, and in fact, this is the car that is helping to “reinvent” the Buick brand. The Enclave that debuted two years ago went in the reinvention direction, it was however, less reinvention and more a new segment for the brand. The Enclave was the vehicle that started generating younger foot traffic into Buick showrooms. That is a good start, and this new LaCrosse looks to keep that momentum going. So how is the car? Well this is not your grandpa’s Buick.
The last generation LaCrosse was a curvy affair that had four headlights and the bland styling of white bread. Buick has set its sights upon some new comers and some industry leaders ranging from the new Lincoln MKZ and Acura TL to the recently updated Lexus ES350 and let’s not forget the aging, and not gracefully I might add, Toyota Avalon. These are the “main competitors” in GM’s view. The list makes sense to me, although I believe, the main direct competitor is the Lexus ES350. The advertising is poking at Lexus and the Buick is actually better looking.
The exterior design of the new LaCrosse has a very strong sweep spear line down the side. The character line goes continuously from the headlights all the way down the side to the tail lights, creating a long and flowing line that helps to give the sides character. This, along with curves toward the bottom of the doors, keep the car from appearing slab sided. The front has a new modernized interpretation on the Buick waterfall grille. Following the current trend, this car has a high belt line and the result is down right good looking. No yawn inducing smoothed out jelly bean here. The bland styling from the previous generation LaCrosse has been kicked to the curb for LED tail lights and that bold character line down the side. With dual exhaust and finishers, the whole outside screams “I have style”.
Everyone that got in the interior commented on how nice the Lexus was. That is until I told them it was the new Buick. It took their breath away. Once you get past that you are in a Buick, you have to stop yourself because suddenly you want to admit you like this Buick. It is ok, someday it will be the cool thing, and this is the big first step toward that day. The interior was designed with input from the Chinese division within GM. Why would they do that you ask? The answer is because Buick is a smash hit over in China, so they decided to have the market where Buick sells best design the interior. Lets just say, bravo. The gauge cluster looks great, probably one of the best in any GM vehicle. The whole entire dash is covered in soft material which is how it should be. The bottom, by your knees and where the glove box is, continues to be made of hard plastic. It does look good, and you will rarely touch it. The steering wheel both tilts and telescopes to help find the perfect driving position.
The car I had was a top tier CXS model with no additional options other then special paint for $195. The sticker price was $33,960. Equipped with an auxiliary jack and a USB port you could listen to your music from your iPhone or iPod through the Harmon Kardon branded sound system which sounded great. I would even venture to say it rivals the Mark Levinson sound system in the Lexus ES350. The wheels were 18″ with chrome plating. I really liked the CXS standard heated steering wheel.
The car comes with three different engines. The top shelf CXS I had came with a one choice 3.6 liter V6 featuring direct injection putting out 280 hp and 259 lb-ft to the front wheels. Rated at 17/27 mpg, the car averaged 21.5 mpg with a mix of city/highway driving. If you step down one trim level to the CXL you can get all wheel drive as a option, but you can not get the 3.6 V6, you have one choice, a 3.0 liter with 255 hp and 217 lb-ft. The base CX model comes in front wheel drive with the 3.0 V6 standard though a 2.4 liter four cylinder with 182 hp and 172 lb-ft is optional. I was surprised with how well the torque steer was in check with front wheel drive and the larger 3.6 liter V6.
So it seems all cheers here right? Buick hit a home run with no flaws. Well not exactly. The car uses old goose neck hinges for the trunk which significantly eat into the trunk room. Though the arms are covered so they can not crush luggage, that does not stop them from eating trunk space in a large way. Yes the Lexus ES350 uses them too, but that is not an excuse. Also, the seat tracks in the front have a very open design that, in theory, could easily devour a long evening gown while moving back or forth. Also, as I have mentioned, I am not a huge fan of this high belt line trend. Sure I am being nit picky I will admit that, but they did that good of a job. My biggest complaint is simple. You can not see the rear end when backing up. This thing needs a back up camera stat! The only way to get the back up camera is to have the optional navigation package. When the back up camera is standard on the GMC Terrain, which has a base price less then this CXS, something is not right.
The new LaCrosse certainly is not your grandpa’s Buick anymore. This cars main target are the people shopping for a Lexus ES350. It hits that target while being a better value, having more character, and is overall better looking. Certainly a few things I mentioned could use tweaking, but overall this is a nice execution on General Motors part. Buick’s new marketing slogan is “The new class of world class”, and for the first time this brand has a car that is world class.
Many people have asked me why Pontiac and Saturn are being killed and GMC gets to live. To many on the outside it does not make perfect sense though the answer is quite simple. GMC makes money while Pontiac and Saturn do not. The response I got to that was about how GMC products are mostly rebadged Chevrolet products so how can they make money. Again a simple answer with two parts. GMC is not really cross shopped with Chevrolet according to GM. Also GMC is aimed to be one step above Chevrolet “offering more premium content then Chevy” according to Annalisa Bluhm who works for GM, so that means slightly higher base prices.
The last generation Chevrolet Equinox had a brother and it was the Pontiac Torrent which was about as class competitive as the last generation Equinox was, which was not very. With Pontiac dead and gone spreading the development costs of the new Equinox with another vehicle was key. GMC has been successful with the Lambda based Acadia and thus it was logical to make the new Equinox’s brother a GMC. The new 2010 Terrain, moves GMC into a new segment and gives another vehicle to add to the now empty Pontiac showroom floor space.
Being the brother to the Equinox has its advantages. The interior of the new Equinox is already more then class competitive it is class leading and so changes were not really necessary to compete in this area. With a few upgraded materials here and there and some different graining and texture on some dash panels the interior was a nice place before the switch from Chevrolet to GMC. The exterior styling is what really differentiates the Terrain from the Equinox. With bold, blocky, in your face looks, the Terrain is much more controversially styled then the Equinox. With a blunt front end and squared off fenders, the Terrain is much less curvaceous and soft compared with the Equinox. The huge overly exaggerated fender flares continue this blocky bold styling down the side and towards the rear. Speaking of the rear again much blockier and more bluntly styled then the Equinox. The styling seems to be a love it or hate it with everyone having a opinion. Many people on Twitter seem to thing this is not a good looking rig with one person even saying they thought it was the ugliest vehicle on the road today. I would not personally go that far but it is definitely in your face and styled differently.
During the Terrain’s stay this week I had a road trip down to Hudson, IA to visit some friends and family. With the cruise control set the Terrain was a comfortable highway cruiser lugging along at 75mpg I was averaging 26.3 mpg. It is worth noting that it was chilly here during the trip and this probably affected the gas milage slightly. The Terrain utilizes the same exact engine choices as the Equinox either the 2.4L four cylinder or the optional 3.0L V6 both engines are feature great new technology. Utilizing VVT (variable valve timing) and direct injection both these engines are class leading in gas milage ratings. The Terrain I had was rated at 20/29 mpg due to the all wheel drive. Without the all wheel drive ratings would have been 22/32 mpg. The Terrain also utilizes the great six speed automatic used in the Equinox. Since I had the four cylinder it had the “eco” button which changes shift points. The Terrain drove smoother and I enjoyed the way the transmission worked while in eco mode much more then when not. According to GM eco mode earns you one mile per gallon more in gas milage.
The Terrain I had was a SLE2 with a few option packages including the convenience package, trailering equipment package, cargo management package, and 18″ machined aluminum wheels. The sticker price on this particular vehicle was $29,630. This vehicle was far from stripped yet is only one step above the base SLE with a few option packages. The convenience package put in heated seats which were great when the temperature dipped into the low 30′s during the week. Also in that package was the remote vehicle start which again was great when the temperatures got into the 30′s. Bluetooth was another great standard feature in this particular vehicle. In this writers opinion bluetooth should be standard in every car for safety reasons. Many cars have fog lights but not many do much for the driver. The fog lights on the Terrain surprised me adding a lot of extra light on the ground in front of you. Much more then you would expect especially considering how tiny they are.
At the end of the day we have a platform mate to the Equinox. It is more controversially styled and is priced about $1,810 more in base price. I feel the styling is good but then again I think the Mercedes Benz GLK is good looking and that thing is a chiseled block, so blocky does not bother me. With a premium look and feel this classy vehicle has what it takes to beat the competition. The looks are polarizing which gets you noticed and that is exactly what GM needs for the GMC Terrain, people noticing it. Like the Equinox with better fuel economy and overall execution then the main competition mainly Toyota Rav4 and Honda CR-V the Terrain is a great option in a crowded segment. My recommendation, if the Equinox is not your taste in style check the Terrain before you look else where.